Relationship between a pro-thrombotic platelet phenotype (P-Selectin, GPIIb/IIIa complex etc.) and the new coronavirus (COVID-19)

The new coronavirus (Covid-19) is known to cause a hypercoagulable state such as cardiovascular complications as well as acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).

A group from Technical University of Munich etc. has used antibody panels of 21 membrane-penetrating proteins, to investigate the expression status of those markers in platelets by mass cytometry.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41419-020-03333-9

From Mass cytometry, it was fount that the expression of P-Selectin (0.67 vs. 1.87 Healthy Median vs. Median COVID-19 patients, p = 0.0015), LAMP-3 (CD63, 0.37 vs. 0.81, p = 0.0004), GPIIb/IIIa complex (4.58 vs. 5.03, p< 0.0001) are upregulated. P-Selectin functions as a cell adhesion molecule on the surfaces of activated endothelial cells, which line the inner surface of blood vessels, and activates platelets. GPIIb/IIIa is an integrin complex found on platelets, a receptor for fibrinogen and von Willebrand factor, and aids platelet activation。LAMP-3 is one of the lysosome-associated membrane glycoproteins。

The adhesion protein P-Selectin translocates to the plasma membrane upon activation and regulates platelet–leukocyte interactions resulting in activation of neutrophil integrins and inducing NETS formation. NETS is one of functions of innate immunity, and capture and eliminate virus. However, the excess NETS leads to hypercoagulopathy. P-Selectin expression together with the upregulation of the GPIIb/IIIa comples contributes to the COVID-19 inflammatory response. Although the pathophysiological mechanisms behind the high incidence of thromboembolic events in hospitalized COVID-19 patients remain unclear and the key drivers behind platelet activation in COVID-19 remain to be determined, it may be induced by infected endothelium as well as by the cytokine storm occurring during SARS-CoV-2 infection.

The new coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) and ABO Blood Types

Several research institutes have already reported that type O blood is more resistant to SARS-CoV-2 and type A blood is less resistant. This suggests that the presence of anti-A antibodies must be related to SARS-CoV-2 infection protection.
A group from Universe libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium, etc. has speculated that the presence of anti-A and anti-B antibodies is a true problem and that it is related to the protective effect against SARS-CoV-2.

https://www.ijidonline.com/article/S1201-9712(20)32549-2/fulltext

Type O: IgM anti-A+ anti-B agglutination score: 88.29±33.01 (healthy people), 76.93±34.93 (COVID-19 patients)
Type A: IgM Anti-B agglutination score: 30.40±18.84 (Healthy), 24.93±18.73 (COVID-19 Patients)
Type B: IgM anti-A agglutination score: 36.50±17.41 (healthy persons), 28.56±17.41 (COVID-19 patients)

From these results, it could be said that as the presence of anti-A antibodies and anti-B antibodies is small, the resistance to SARS-CoV-2 weakens and it becomes easy to become infected, and if the amount of presence is not large, the effect of infection protection due to differences in blood types would not be clear.

Anti-A and anti-B antibodies are synthesized by immune stimulation from gastrointestinal microbiota. Both these antibody production and microbiota vary greatly according to an individual’s age and nutritional status. In other words, the promotion of ABO antibody production by the gastrointestinal microbiota will help prevent the infection of the novel coronavirus! ?

Plasma neutralizing antibodies in convalescent patients recovering from the new coronavirus (COVID-19) stop working with time

The key question in vaccine development would be, under the selective pressure of the polyclonal immune response of vaccinated people, if the virus evolves to escape from the immunity? and if it is effective against virus mutations or not?

A group from Fondazione Toscana Life Sciences, Siena, Italy etc. has reported the results of co-culture of cells and virus with using neutralize antibodies (polyclonal) obtained from the plasma of convalescent patients from the new coronavirus (COVID-19).
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33398278/

In this experiment, VERO E6 cells and SARS-CoV-2 were co-cultured for 100 days (14 passages over) using neutralizing antibodies with the highest neutralizing titer among 20 convalescent patients, to investigate the relationship between changes in the titer of neutralize antibodies and genetic mutations that occurred in viruses. In this experiment, the following mutations have occurred in the NTD and RBD of the S protein, and it is shown that the titer of the neutralize antibody decreases with it.

  1. deletion of the phenylalanine in position 140 (F140) on the S-protein NTD N3 loop.
  2. glutamic acid in position 484 of the RBD was substituted with a lysine (E484K).
  3. 11-amino-acid insertion between Y248 and L249 in the NTD N5 loop (248aKTRNKSTSRRE248k).

The results of this experiment show that virus can evolve to escape from the selective pressure of even the highest titer neutralize antibodies. So, it is recommended to use cocktail antibodies for treatment. In addition, it suggests the need to develop a second-generation vaccine that can accommodate mutations.

Targeting cancer cells using lectococcus lactis (gram-positive bacteria) expressed lectins

In cancer, aberrant glycans are expressed on the membrane. The structures and densities, of course, vary depending on the cancer types, but in general, it would be characterized by the expression of multi-branched N-glycans, the increase of O-glycans, the truncation of O-glycans, and the changes in terminal modification (i.e., sialic acid, fucose).
A group from Univ. of Ljubljana has proposed a method of targeting to cancer cells by using geneicaly modified Lactoccus lactis (a type of Gram-positive bacteria) to express lectins on the membrane specific to the aberrant  glycans of cancer cells.
https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2607/9/2/223/htm

Specifically, they focused on two types of lectins. One is B subunit of Shiga holotoxin (Stx1B) and the other is Critocybe Nebularis lectin (CNL).
The glycan binding specificity of these lectins is as follows,
Stx1B = Gb3,
CNL = LacdiNAc.

Since these lectin genomes have been published, they have been incorporated into plasmids, and lectococcus lactis were modified using the plasmids to express those lectins on the cell membrane.
Stx1B itself has  cytotoxicity, so it can effectively adhere to cancer cells and kill them as shown below.
Since CNL has not cytotoxicity, targeting to cancer cells is possible, but it is not cytotoxic at all.
Finally, they are proposing a method of using such bacteria modified to express lectins suitable for targeting to cancer cells carrying therapeutic agents.

Genetic variants in Mannose Binding Lectin (MBL) appears to be significantly related to the severity of the new coronavirus (COVID-19)

It is known that there are three type of innate immunity, (1)phagocytosis with phagocytic cells such as macrophages and NK cells, (2)complement lectin pathways, and (3)extra-spherical traps . In the complement lectin pathway, Mannose Binding Lectin (MBL) plays a central role, and when MBL binds to the mannose on the pathogen’s cell membrane, an enzyme called MBL-binding serine protease (MASP) bound to MBL is activated, and MASP activates the complement Factor 4 (C4), which sequentially activates the complements and ultimately kills it by drilling a hole in the pathogen’s cell membrane.

A group of Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul Univ. has reported that the genetic variants in MBL are largely related to the severity of covid-19.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7838598/

For the mutation of codon52 of the MBL2 gene,
Referring to AA genotype,
BB genotype: odds ratio (OR) = 5.3, p< 0.001;
AB genotype: OR = 2.9, p = 0.001

For the ICU need, the odds ratios get higher as follows,
BB genotype: OR = 19.6, p < 0.001
AB genotype: OR = 6.9, p = 0.001

This could be a good reference in using MBL as a therapeutic protein.

Importance of Innate Lymphoid Cells (ILCs) in the new coronavirus (COVID-19)

The new coronavirus (COVID-19) causes lymphopenia. However, an interesting fact emerges when the correlation with the disease severity is examined in detail about the subsets of the lymphocytes.
A group from The University of Massachusetts Medical School etc. has  focused on Innate Lymphoid Cells (ILCs) and reported an interesting correlation with the severity of COVID-19.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7814851/

ILCs are lymphocytes that do not have antigen receptors and are the main biological defense mechanism in immunity in the prestage leading up to the development of acquired immunity. NK cells with cytotoxicity are also classified as ILCs. It can be said that ILCs are divided into those mainly producing cytokines and those with cytotoxicity. In this paper, ILCs are defined as cell populations excluding NK cells.

In patients with COVID-19, ILCs are reduced by 1.78 times (95% CI: 2.34–1.36) and CD16+ NK cells by 2.31 times (95% CI: 3.1–1.71) compared to healthy people.
Interestingly, it was shown that ILCs was, but not CD16+ NK cells, CD4+ T cells, or CD8+ T cells, correlated with hospitalization, and the odds ratio of hospitalization was 0.413 (95% CI: 0.197–0.724) for every 2-fold increase in ILCs. They also showed that as ILCs increased, the odds ratio of hospitalization rates decreased, duration of hospitalization were shortened, and CRP, an inflammatory marker, decreased.

This finding is likely to lead to new treatments, I feel.

Are glycans related to the tissue targeting performance of Adeno-associated virus (AAV)?

In gene therapy using Adeno-associated virus (AAV), it has been suggested that there are some differences in AAV capsids in terms of tissue targeting ability, and it has been told that glycans may be involved in he AAV’s tissue targeting ability. Such arguments have been around for quite some time.
For example, the following papers are references.
https://www.nature.com/articles/gt201316
https://www.jbc.org/article/S0021-9258(20)51734-1/fulltext
https://www.jbc.org/article/S0021-9258(20)48853-2/fulltext
https://jvi.asm.org/content/80/18/9093

Specifically, it has been reported that AAV-1 and AAV-6 bind to Sialic acid, AAV-2 binds to Heparan sulfate, and AAV-9 binds to Galatose.
But, is it true?
To this blog admin., it is a kind of unbelievable thing that capsid proteins have lectin-like functions?

Glycan markers for pancreatic duct adenocarcinoma

A group from Medical University of South Carolina etc. has reported their findings on glycan markers for pancreatic duct adenocarcinoma.
https://www.mcponline.org/article/S1535-9476(20)35126-4/fulltext

In order to study the glycan markers of pancreatic duct adenocarcinoma in detail, MS (MALDI-FTICR, MALDI-QTOF), antibody immunostaining (CA19-9, TRA-1-60), lectin staining (PHA-E, GSL-II) were used.

To summarize the results, pancreatic duct adenocarcinoma has an increase in the structure of α2-3 Sia, poly-LacNAc, branching, bisecting GlcNAc, core fucose, and terminal GalNAc compared to normal tissues. As for Sia, α2-3Sia is mainly expressed in tumor stroma regions, and α2-6Sia is slightly stronger in adenocarcinoma regions.

MicroRNA (miR-630) derived from tonsils may be deeply involved in IgA nephropathy

IgA nephropathy is a typical intractable disease of chronic kidney disease in which IgA (one of the immunoglobulins) is deposited in the glomerulus (a urine filtration device) with aberrant glycan modification. It is also well known that abnormalities occur in the O-glycan modification in the IgA hinge region.
A group from Central South University, Changsha, China etc. has indicated that IgA, the glycan abnormality found in IgA nephropathy, might be controlled by microRNA (miR-630) derived from tonsil mononucleated cells.
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2020.563699/full

As for the mechanism of the onset of IgA nephropathy, it was suggested that miR-630 derived from the tonsils is produced excessively,  and targets Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4)  as the target gene, and finally modulates the concentration of IgA and its glycosylation level through the NF-kB signaling pathway.

Changes in glycan modification accompanied by change from ESC to epiblast-like cells (EpiLCs) and its control factor behind them

A group from Soka University etc. has reported on changes in glycan modification accompanied by change from ESC to epiblast-like cells (EpiLCs) and a control factor behind them.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-79666-4

With the change from ESC to EpiLCs, the following changes in glycan modification occur:

  1. For N-type glycans, the high mannose structure is the main structure in common, but in EpiLCs, fucose modification, bisecting, and Sia modification are increased, for Sia, α2-6 is the main linkage, and typeI LacNAc (Galβ1-3GlcNAc) is highly expressed with α1-2Fuc modified.
  2. For O-type sugar chains, Tn antigen and O-GlcNAc are the main in common, but in EpiLCs, the expression of O-glycan is generally increasing, and elongated mucin type O-glycans also increase.
  3. For Glycosaminoglycans (GAG), EpiLCs generally increase GAG expression, especially Heparan sulfate (HS), chondroitin sulfate (CS) and dermatan sulfate (DS).
  4. For glycolipids, EpiLCs cause structural changes from globo (Gb) to ganglio (Gg).

Behind these glycan modification, polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2), a chromatin protein, was shown to be involved as a regulator. A number of glycosyltransferase genes involved in glycan modification of ESC is under the control of PRC2.